🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized image promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have worked together to craft a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a TV series released last fall, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from chaos. Although the character's name Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals often end up reinforcing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film based on a popular book sets out to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is shown as having been picked by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would rather govern from the background, seeking enduring influence.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. Historically, none of this ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with him to take the job. The presidency was in essence a casting call with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the country in practice.

• The shortlist included several politicians, including an opposition leader later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the process stated the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not involved with field operations.

Interestingly, the move to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. His harder version prompted Russian media and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing the actor's likeness with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its omission of public dissent, the opposition, or key figures in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

Domestically, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears directly. His influence is signaled through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.