🔗 Share this article

Transpired the manager was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, laying waste to the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Over System and Philosophy

To illustrate, this was the director , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man with the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Football Order: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive professional resumes. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism in action: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire him for using excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later discard them for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.