🔗 Share this article

While the struggling Conservative party convenes in its conference city for its annual party conference, it has much to ponder regarding its path forward. There is uncertainty if a viable path exists at all. These are tough times for a governing group that now has little, if anything, fresh or distinctive to say to voters.

An Alternate Reality

The situation might have been vastly better if concrete steps had been made on an agenda that resonates with people across the country: Levelling up. But the previous administration lacked the slightest idea on how to turn the trendy talk on social mobility into policy reality. For the two years after the general election, it argued over what the concept even meant.

I was perplexed, because I’d already told Johnson what levelling up signified when we initially discussed about it during his leadership campaign. The expression was a term I developed and used at the education ministry to talk about equal opportunity. It was our guiding principle, and its definition is straightforward: social mobility is the means by which we achieve fair chances – not by taking opportunity away from those who possess it, but rather by extending chances to those that are without.

Fundamental Idea

Another crucial DfE phrase we used, “talent is spread evenly throughout the nation, yet chances are not”, served as a purposeful phrase, representing the two halves of a equal opportunity plan. To begin with, talent spread evenly but not cultivated evenly through our learning institutions. Furthermore, opportunities not spread evenly by employers or our economic system. Therefore, schools and companies were essential to achieving stronger social mobility. This was an mission about the societal structure of our country – supporting people’s potential and providing access to prospects.

What Levelling Up Became

How did levelling up become under the Tory administration? Local investment schemes administered out of the the relevant ministry. Decorative floral displays and rearranged intersections. A white paper was launched a significant period after the Prime Minister took office, which saw existing policy approaches rebadged under the recently branded agenda.

Consequently, a comprehensive equal opportunity plan went undeveloped, as well as all the reform that it could have inspired – in investment, commerce, economic policy, taxation and in community development. And, of course, in learning, including a university system that has become a target for elected officials – even though it remains the most powerful engine of social mobility for individuals from less privileged homes, like me, this country has had in recent decades. Perhaps the sole mechanism of social mobility, functioning widely.

Why Hope Matters

Hope is essential for our country to prosper. For people to have aspiration, there needs to be a credible sense that dedication and outcome are related; that if people aspire, they can achieve. For any government, being able to create a sense of optimism about the future is important. Analysis by the academic institution at the academic establishment and others, recently released, showed that the ministry’s focus zones I launched while in office – community-focused methods to boosting academic achievement – led to youth in those communities being up to nearly one-fifth more positive about their prospects than those in comparable communities without these schemes in place. The research confirms: just making an authentic start on equal chance initiatives can swiftly and beneficially change how people feel about their future.

Lost Potential

Unaware of these findings, and in the throes of its new leader election, in that period, the Conservative government ended the initiatives. What reason would someone in those areas vote for a political group that made that decision? The opportunity areas policy is a clear case of what could have been a revolutionary administration strategy on levelling up, but that opportunity was completely wasted. Approaches such as this can generate optimism and ambition. In contrast, as the Conservatives learned, breaking the promise of social mobility is the costliest mistake any leadership can make. The public held accountable the leadership for its incompetence but, primarily, for its broken promises on levelling up.

The Current Landscape

Currently the mandate on life chances and fair access has been transferred to a Labour government. The old slogan has been cast off. Labour has its own public messaging of “eliminating hurdles to advancement”. The political group that is gradually replacing the struggling Tories, the challenger, also has its own language – “reindustrialisation”. The terminology to talk about new opportunities in regions like the one I come from, in my hometown. It suggests that an historical manufacturing base can revive into an revitalized economy.

To the electorate, it must seem like a Groundhog Day-style loop. Identical problem, alternative phrasing. However, so far, no progress.

The Way Forward

If Labour and Reform UK want to avoid the similar destiny, both these parties should take lessons from the Conservatives’ failure on social mobility; that fair chance language is simple terminology, but actual achievement of more equal results is much harder. Our nation’s chronically poor life chances remains the primary challenge for our country, with youth unable to get a good job beginning, those laboring in full-time jobs with minimal progress after the housing costs are covered, and people across the country without any real hope their offspring will be able to do any better in life than they have.

Elected officials can mention equal chances however much they like. However, which party has the political group that has the comprehensive policy agenda on equal opportunity? I see none. Whoever gets there first, prevails. Not only for their party, but, more importantly, for a complete society that has urgently needs equality of opportunity so badly.