🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, Trump appeared to take a strong approach concerning the Ukrainian conflict. Following issuing threats of "significant consequences" during the summer in case Russia's president carried on blocking ceasefire discussions, Trump eventually imposed considerable penalties on Russia's biggest oil companies, Rosneft and Lukoil. This decision significantly affected the Russian leader's capability to fund his war effort in Ukraine.

Yet, through his latest comprehensive peace proposal for the conflict, that was drafted by US and Russian diplomats without Ukraine's or European involvement, the former president has apparently gone back to his Russia-friendly approach.

Rewarding Aggression

This plan would essentially reward the Russian leader for invading Ukraine while putting the country's political freedom in jeopardy. Despite bold statements that "Ukraine's autonomy will be confirmed", significant aspects of the initiative actually compromise that same independence. What represents a Russian ideal would probably be a catastrophe for the nation.

Demonstrating his real-estate background, the former president seems to treat the situation in Ukraine as a mere land disagreement, implying ceding Putin a portion of Ukraine's land will satisfy the president. However, Putin's invasion is not merely about dominating a damaged swath of economically weakened area in Ukraine's east. Rather, it is about the nation's political system – and Putin's clear intention to destroy it so it stops serves as an attractive model for the Russian citizens of the accountable government that Putin's deepening autocracy denies them.

Border Concessions

Although keeping in place the already separated regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, the initiative would compel Ukraine to give up the whole Donetsk province. Aside from favoring the Russian Federation with territory that its military have been unable to occupy in more than a decade of warfare, this concession would render Ukrainian defensive positions critically weakened.

Donetsk is the site of Ukraine's much-vaunted "stronghold system", the well-established protective structures that are a critical obstacle to enemy progress. The proposal would have Ukraine surrender these positions, leaving Putin a open way to the capital should he subsequently opt to restart the conflict.

Defense Reductions

Then, in a step that would make additional conflict simpler for the Russian military, the plan would mandate Ukraine to cut the numbers of its armed forces from their current 800,000 to 850,000 soldiers to a limit of this lower number. Importantly, the proposal imposes no such constraints on the invading army.

Apparently as a accommodation to Putin's efforts to characterize Ukraine's chosen by the people government as extremists, Trump's proposal states: "Every radical ideology and practices must be opposed and banned." Apparently to emphasize this point, it insists that "Ukraine will hold democratic votes in three months" of a truce. However, Trump places no condition that Putin risk his authoritarian rule by conducting votes in his own country.

Defense Commitments

To be sure, the proposal has Russia pledge not to "invade other states" and to "enshrine in regulation its policy of non-violence towards Europe and Ukraine". However given that Putin has breached similar accords in the previous instances – including the 1994 Budapest memorandum, in which the Russian government committed to recognize Ukraine's sovereignty in exchange for giving up its former Soviet nuclear arsenal, and the 2014-2015 Minsk agreements, in which Moscow committed to a halt in fighting and a restoration of seized territory in eastern Ukraine to Ukrainian control – why should the international community believe this commitment now?

For this reason Ukraine has been so adamant on western protection assurances. While the initiative promises a "immediate coordinated armed reaction" should Russia restart its aggression, and includes that "Ukraine will receive strong protection assurances", the details range from unclear to troubling. The proposal would not only prevent the nation Nato membership but also preclude alliance nations from stationing troops on the nation's land, thereby preventing the security presence, reportedly led by Britain and France, on which Ukraine had been depending to stop Russia from rebuilding his weakened military, re-equipping, and reinvading.

World Reaction

Another side agreement apparently would offer Ukraine with a similar to NATO security guarantee, in which any subsequent "major, deliberate, and continuous military assault" by the Russian Federation on the country "would be considered as an attack jeopardizing the stability and safety of the Western nations." That suggests a military response. However different from a strong Ukrainian military – Ukraine's most reliable deterrent against future hostilities – the effectiveness of the supplementary deal would rely on the willingness of alliance members, such as Trump, to react militarily to Putin's hostilities, an action they have {not